Class warfare erupted in a House Democratic Caucus meeting Tuesday, as Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi?s personal fortune was thrown in her face by a junior colleague angry about a proposal to freeze the pay of members of Congress.
Rep. Laura Richardson attacked Pelosi for endorsing the GOP-written pay freeze during a Tuesday caucus discussion of a possible Democratic amendment to the payroll tax cut, according to several sources who were in the room at the time. Both women are California Democrats.
Continue ReadingThe sources disagreed on the exact wording of the unusually direct shot at the party leader, but Richardson?s sentiment was clear: Pelosi, who is worth at least $40 million, doesn?t need the money as much as some of her colleagues, and she should have consulted with them before deciding to protect the GOP-written pay freeze.
It was ?something like ?Well I am sorry, Madam Leader, but some of us are not in the financial situation you are in,?? said one source.
Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) jumped in to contend that members should be willing to take a pay freeze as part of a bill that is blocking raises for other federal civilian workers.
But sources said it was one of the most tense intra-party changes in recent memory.
?Pelosi was so pissed off,? said one senior Democratic aide. ?Richardson looked like a buffoon, like ?I need my money.??
According to at least one Democratic insider, Richardson eventually said that she would support the Democratic proposal.
Richardson?s office declined to comment at press time.
In point of fact, Richardson does need the money. She?s one of the poorest members of Congress, with debts that appear to outstrip her assets, according to her most recent financial disclosure form. Pelosi, by contrast, routinely ranks among the most wealthy lawmakers.
Richardson faces an Ethics Committee probe into allegations she and her top aides allegedly pressured other staffers to work on her reelection campaign or be fired. Staffers on the congressional payroll are prohibited from working on political campaigns while they are on the government clock.
In addition, under House ethics rules and federal law, government resources cannot be used for any campaign-related activities.
Richardson has denied any wrongdoing, but this probe, as well as an earlier Ethics Committee investigation into her personal finances and a foreclosed home, have cost her hundreds of thousands in legal fees. Richardson is currently carrying a personal debt of at least $150,000 to her defense attorneys, and her reelection campaign owes another $125,000-plus, according to recent reports.
dia frampton zook john elway john elway eric decker eric decker jr martinez
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.